Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
Cpaw, I always see you saying Rod made the wrong signings, and we should have signed a shooter and VC should have been traded, etc., but when people say, "Well who should have Rod signed?" and "Who should he have traded VC for specifically?", you just avoid the question.
So who were these specific players he should have targeted?
So who were these specific players he should have targeted?

-

Eduardo's Empanada - Posts: 2550
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:00 pm
- Location: A True Underdog Story
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
The Cpaw comments that pushed me over the edge on Thorn are the ones about finding undrafted or D-league players and hiring Stefanski and Kiki.
Gotta admit those two flaws are pretty damaging since other teams have mined some form of talent from there and those two guys are horrible.
Gotta admit those two flaws are pretty damaging since other teams have mined some form of talent from there and those two guys are horrible.
-

Netted - Posts: 3970
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:15 pm
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
Eduardo's Empanada wrote:Cpaw, I always see you saying Rod made the wrong signings, and we should have signed a shooter and VC should have been traded, etc., but when people say, "Well who should have Rod signed?" and "Who should he have traded VC for specifically?", you just avoid the question.
So who were these specific players he should have targeted?
As I have said before, I have thousands of posts at bbb/bbf that cover all of this. There was even a giant thread about trading Vince that SeaNet started (boy was that fun to moderate)
-

cpawfan - Site Admin
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:01 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
totally agree with this thread. rod and kiki are a joke.
how many times they have to say the man who drafted MJ please get over it.
how many times they have to say the man who drafted MJ please get over it.
-

killa kadafi191 - Posts: 728
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 12:39 pm
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
cpawfan wrote:As I have said before, I have thousands of posts at bbb/bbf that cover all of this. There was even a giant thread about trading Vince that SeaNet started (boy was that fun to moderate)
I don't know what bbb and bbf are, so how bout you humor me and waste one more of those thousands of posts and tell me some specific examples.

-

Eduardo's Empanada - Posts: 2550
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:00 pm
- Location: A True Underdog Story
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
The Nets really cant suck next year.
What is Rod going to draft Antoine Wright again and sign Ron Mercer?
We know the FA list, we know the top 4-5 prospects. There will be some trades, he has a real owner, he will be fine.
What is Rod going to draft Antoine Wright again and sign Ron Mercer?
We know the FA list, we know the top 4-5 prospects. There will be some trades, he has a real owner, he will be fine.
"First I got to get big like Dwight Howard, Im gonna do that"
"We also have Anthony Morrow he’s one of the best for three-point throws. It’s very important for our team. "
"We also have Anthony Morrow he’s one of the best for three-point throws. It’s very important for our team. "
-

mb4th - Posts: 2901
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:58 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
As dissapointed as we fans may be, our frustration should be directed to one person and one person alone Bruce Ratner. Rod Thorn and I hate to say it even Kiki are only following Ratners demand to cut costs. The front office can't publically be critical of the owner because the organization will look completely dysfunctional. We as fans are disappointed with the team, Thorn and Kiki have the hard part, keep the interal frustrations e.g players mouthing off in house and maintaining their sanity until the sale is complete.
About the draft picks, who knows how guys will pan out? Joe Dumars drafted Darko with 3 allstars/ HOF on the board, the Bobcats taking DJ Augustine with Brook Lopez available, the Clippers passing on Amare for Chris Wilcox let me not add the Oden and Durant and off course the 1984 draft Sam Bowie with his Airness on the board.
About the draft picks, who knows how guys will pan out? Joe Dumars drafted Darko with 3 allstars/ HOF on the board, the Bobcats taking DJ Augustine with Brook Lopez available, the Clippers passing on Amare for Chris Wilcox let me not add the Oden and Durant and off course the 1984 draft Sam Bowie with his Airness on the board.
- blkswizz
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
I just don't see how that is an excuse for being the worst team ever. Other teams have handicaps too.
- GrandKenyon6
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 2:21 pm
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
the Thorn report card
http://www.netsdaily.com/blog/?p=1548
the Thorn curse
http://www.netsdaily.com/blog/?p=585
http://www.netsdaily.com/blog/?p=1548
the Thorn curse
http://www.netsdaily.com/blog/?p=585
- kk30
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:07 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
kk30 wrote:the Thorn report card
http://www.netsdaily.com/blog/?p=1548
the Thorn curse
http://www.netsdaily.com/blog/?p=585
NI is pro-Thorn and I disagree with a lot of his conclusions
-

cpawfan - Site Admin
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:01 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
GrandKenyon6 wrote:I just don't see how that is an excuse for being the worst team ever. Other teams have handicaps too.
lol
We cut costs this year. Thorn was told to try and dump VC and picks for Raef Lafrenz. I wouldnt be shocked if they discussed selling the draft pick
All he had to improve was the #1 draft pick, thats it. Nothing else to improve the team. Not even Warrick on a 1 yr deal
"First I got to get big like Dwight Howard, Im gonna do that"
"We also have Anthony Morrow he’s one of the best for three-point throws. It’s very important for our team. "
"We also have Anthony Morrow he’s one of the best for three-point throws. It’s very important for our team. "
-

mb4th - Posts: 2901
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:58 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
cpawfan wrote:NI is pro-Thorn and I disagree with a lot of his conclusions
what are the links to your articles tracking rod thorn's history as nets executive / GM?
-

gigantes - Posts: 503
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:43 pm
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
cpawfan wrote:Other teams found useful players in the D League or signed undrafted free agents that panned out. For a team on a budget, those are two huge failings. The players Rod took a chance on all sucked. That isn't luck.
Even Warriors GM has done much better job with that.
How can you be so bad at your job that when your team goes to back-to-back finals, there aren't any people watching. I blame Tron for reversible jerseys and fans of the away-team filling the arena. Finding people who can play with Kidd, Kenyon & RJ was THAT hard? Why would you want to give that FO anymore chances?!
-

fiElDy - Posts: 107
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:33 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
gigantes wrote:what are the links to your articles tracking rod thorn's history as nets executive / GM?
Why does it matter if they are articles or 1000's upon 1000's of forum posts? It isn't some news flash that I'm calling for Thorn's head. I've been pointing out his incompetence for years.
nj.com/nets if they actually kept history
bbb/bbf
s2
here
I don't hide from my posting history and there are plenty here that have been posting with me for years.
-

cpawfan - Site Admin
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:01 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
cpawfan wrote:Why does it matter if they are articles or 1000's upon 1000's of forum posts?
readability, for one.
i mean, i have thousands of earnest webforum and BBS posts to my credit as well, but i'd trade them all for a warm bag of dog excrement right about now.
raise your bag of dog excrement in the air if you even know what "BBS" means. exactly.
anyway, now's your big chance to tie your theories into a single comprehensible article and add it to the netsdaily blog section. a chance to rebut NI in a venue that matters, if you will...
-

gigantes - Posts: 503
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:43 pm
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
gigantes wrote:raise your bag of dog excrement in the air if you even know what "BBS" means. exactly.
I've read and posted on usenet from VAX terminals. BBS is nothing
-

cpawfan - Site Admin
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:01 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
gigantes wrote:readability, for one.
anyway, now's your big chance to tie your theories into a single comprehensible article and add it to the netsdaily blog section. a chance to rebut NI in a venue that matters, if you will...
Readability???? I think the poll asking people to predict if Jeff McInnis would be on the Nets playoff roster prior to the start of his first season is very readable. http://www.basketballforum.com/new-jers ... oster.html
This forum matters plenty. I don't see nor feel the need to be verbose for the sake of formality.
-

cpawfan - Site Admin
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 6:01 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
cpawfan wrote:
Readability???? I think the poll asking people to predict if Jeff McInnis would be on the Nets playoff roster prior to the start of his first season is very readable. http://www.basketballforum.com/new-jers ... oster.html
This forum matters plenty. I don't see nor feel the need to be verbose for the sake of formality.
It feels good to be on the "No" side
-

fiElDy - Posts: 107
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:33 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
Meh. Didnt you and Ghoti hate Brook Lopez? Ill take Brook over Granger or 2006 Stromile Swift
"First I got to get big like Dwight Howard, Im gonna do that"
"We also have Anthony Morrow he’s one of the best for three-point throws. It’s very important for our team. "
"We also have Anthony Morrow he’s one of the best for three-point throws. It’s very important for our team. "
-

mb4th - Posts: 2901
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:58 am
Re: Without a new Front Office, the Nets will continue to suck
blkswizz wrote:As dissapointed as we fans may be, our frustration should be directed to one person and one person alone Bruce Ratner. Rod Thorn and I hate to say it even Kiki are only following Ratners demand to cut costs. The front office can't publically be critical of the owner because the organization will look completely dysfunctional. We as fans are disappointed with the team, Thorn and Kiki have the hard part, keep the interal frustrations e.g players mouthing off in house and maintaining their sanity until the sale is complete.
Absolutely correct.
- PhilNYC
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:45 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
